When it comes to martial arts, the debate of which is better between Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) and Japanese Jujutsu (JJJ) is a common one. While both are martial arts that involve grappling, there are distinct differences between the two.
JJJ is a traditional martial art that originated in Japan and is considered to be one of the oldest martial arts. It is a form of unarmed combat that focuses on taking down an opponent by using strikes, takedowns, and joint locks. It also teaches students how to defend themselves against weapons. JJJ has a wide variety of techniques that can be used to subdue an opponent, including throws, joint locks, and strikes.
BJJ, on the other hand, is a modern martial art that originated in Brazil. It is based on the traditional Japanese Jujutsu, but it has evolved to focus more on ground fighting. Striking exchanges have no place in Brazilian jiu-jitsu.
BJJ is all about getting the opponent to the ground without causing them harm. It is a very effective martial art for self-defense, as it teaches students how to take control of a situation without causing serious injury and hence avoiding legal liabilities. BJJ also focuses on submission holds, such as chokes and joint locks, which can be used to quickly subdue an opponent.
So which is better between BJJ and JJJ?
It really depends on the individual and what they are looking for in a martial art.
If someone is looking for a martial art that focuses on ground fighting and submission holds, then BJJ is the way to go. However, if someone is looking for a martial art that teaches a wide variety of techniques, then JJJ is the better choice. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to decide which martial art is best for them.”
John Davis is a dedicated practitioner of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, having first started training in the martial art in 2011. Despite facing significant knee issues that have sidelined him for a period, John remains passionate about the sport and continues to follow all the latest developments in the BJJ community.