Certain techniques and positions often spark heated discussions among practitioners. A recent viral clip of a BJJ practitioner using an RNC to subdue an opponent has reignited the debate about the viability of crossing ankles while executing the submission. This controversial clip has garnered attention, with viewers questioning the safety and effectiveness of crossing ankles in such a position.
As the video begins, spectators see the practitioner skillfully applying the RNC, his opponent seemingly moments away from unconsciousness. Initially, the move is praised for its precision. Yet, as the choke continues, concerns arise. “Is he aiming for an attempted murder charge?” one viewer quips, highlighting the potential danger of prolonging the choke. The clip captures the tense moments, showing the practitioner intermittently releasing and reapplying pressure, suggesting a cautious approach to avoid causing serious harm.
The primary concern with crossing ankles during an RNC stems from the risk of an ankle lock. Critics argue that if the opponent manages to trap the practitioner’s ankles and apply pressure, it could lead to a painful and potentially debilitating submission. This is why many instructors, especially when teaching beginners, emphasize the importance of keeping ankles uncrossed to maintain proper technique and minimize injury risks.
However, seasoned BJJ black belts like Rob Biernacki and Stephan Kesting challenge this conventional wisdom. They argue that crossing ankles is not inherently wrong and can even be advantageous under certain conditions. The key lies in understanding the positioning. If the ankles are crossed above the opponent’s legs, the risk of an ankle lock diminishes significantly. In this scenario, crossing ankles can enhance control over the opponent’s hips, providing a more secure grip and better leverage for the choke.
Moreover, Biernacki and Kesting stress the importance of adaptability. Practitioners must remain vigilant about their leg positioning and be ready to adjust quickly if they sense vulnerability. For instance, if the ankles are crossed below the opponent’s legs and an ankle lock threat emerges, simply extending the leg can neutralize the danger. This swift adjustment allows the practitioner to maintain dominance without compromising safety.
The viral clip also sparked discussions about alternative control techniques. Some viewers suggested using a “gift wrap” or transitioning to kimura control, which offers direct access to other submission opportunities while maintaining control. Others noted that a body triangle, where one leg wraps around the opponent’s waist and locks with the other leg, could provide similar control without the ankle lock risk.
