In a recent video from a McDojo, viewers were treated to a display of what can be best characterized as ‘almost Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu’ techniques that sparked a lively debate online.
The focus was on a technique demonstrated by an Indian woman, which involved pulling guard in what many considered a suboptimal manner. Critics quickly pointed out the execution flaws, with some asserting that the foundational concept of entangling the legs was not entirely flawed but poorly executed.
One user noted that the technique resembled a modified de la Riva guard but lacked crucial elements such as ankle control. This oversight, they argued, made the sweeping motion ineffective, allowing for an easy knee cut pass. Another commentator emphasized the importance of arm control, suggesting that the practitioner should focus on freeing the arms before attempting the leg entanglement.
Wile the idea behind the move might work against an untrained opponent, its execution left much to be desired. The lack of precision in hooking the leg behind the knee was mentioned, which could have transformed the approach into a more viable option.
Several users humorously pointing out the vulnerability that comes from such ground-based techniques. Instead of securing an advantageous position, the execution seemed to invite danger, making one commenter quip about the potential risks involved. The consensus was that relying on such a technique could easily lead to exposure, raising concerns about its efficacy outside the controlled environment of a dojo.
While BJJ offers a rich arsenal of techniques, understanding the context in which they are applied is crucial. Not to mention the way in which they’re applied. And there’s also the issue of testing what you learn in live sparring. This sufficiently showcases that this kind of a demonstration actively puts the person who is executing it in more danger.
