BJJ Black Belt claims Joe Rogan is Wrong: Almost any other grappling style is better for self-defense than BJJ

A Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu black belt Guro Ilan Srulovicz (under Chris Haueter) has ignited a compelling debate by challenging Joe Rogan‘s assertion that BJJ is “the one martial art you need” for self-defense. This veteran practitioner argues that modern BJJ has strayed far from its practical self-defense roots, evolving into a sport-focused discipline that may lack real-world applicability.

“New school Jiu-Jitsu…is a martial art designed to beat itself,”

he explains in his video. According to the black belt, this shift has resulted in techniques and strategies that are highly effective within BJJ’s competitive framework but potentially dangerous or impractical in real confrontations.

“When a martial art becomes self-obsessed within its own circle to beat other people within that circle, it can create rule sets, tactics, techniques, and principles that are counterintuitive to its original goal.”

He highlights several concerning trends in contemporary BJJ, such as the emphasis on complex guard positions, guard pulling, and intricate ground techniques that are ill-suited for unpredictable real-world scenarios.

“These moves might work on soft mats in a controlled environment, but on concrete or against multiple attackers, they can be disastrous,”

he warns.

He also criticizes the reduced focus on takedowns, a fundamental skill for self-defense.

“80% of your energy should be on takedowns,”

he insists, adding that techniques from other grappling arts like Judo or catch wrestling may offer more practical self-defense solutions.

“For self-defense specifically, Judo is way better, catch wrestling is way better, and even in just the grappling circle, virtually almost any other grappling style within the grappling world is better for self-defense.”

This perspective aligns with the black belt’s broader critique of BJJ’s evolution. He cites high-profile examples, such as Kron Gracie‘s struggles in MMA, to illustrate how sport BJJ techniques can fall short against aggressive striking or grappling strategies rooted in real-world application.

“Techniques like the worm guard have zero applicable value for self-defense,”

he asserts.

For those looking to train BJJ with self-defense as the primary goal, the expert recommends a significant reorientation of priorities: dedicate 80% of training time to takedowns and 20% to basic ground techniques. He also advocates for incorporating strikes into training sessions and practicing without a gi to better simulate real-life conditions. Moreover, he stresses the importance of maintaining a dominant position, such as staying on top, rather than relying on the guard position often favored in sport BJJ.

While the black belt acknowledges the many benefits of BJJ, such as its contributions to mental health, physical fitness, and community building, he cautions against conflating sport-specific training with practical self-defense capabilities.

“If you want Jiu-Jitsu because you love it, because it helps you mentally and because it helps you physically – excellent, fully supported,”

he states.

“If you go around then believing you’re a tough guy, like, you know, uh, Joe Rogan and Jocko, Jiu-Jitsu promoters saying it’s like the one martial art that you need, it’s the best martial art, this, that—I highly disagree. For self-defense, highly disagree. Argue Judo—way better.”

“And even just in the grappling circle, wrestling, catch wrestling, virtually almost any other grappling style within the grappling world is better for self-defense. Literally.”