UFC has introduced a new arena configuration for its upcoming Brazilian jiu-jitsu competition series that bears a striking resemblance to designs patented by Karate Combat and used by Craig Jones Invitational.
The controversy surrounds “UFC BJJ: Road to the Title,” a new series premiering June 16th. Promotional materials show competitors grappling in what appears to be a “pit” style arena with sloped walls – a design that Karate Combat has reportedly patented and actively licenses to other organizations.
According to sources familiar with the situation, Karate Combat holds patents for a distinctive arena apparatus featuring a floor with perimeter walls that extend upward and outward at obtuse angles. This “pit” configuration prevents athletes from easily escaping the competition area while creating unique tactical considerations.
Records indicate that Karate Combat has been protective of this intellectual property. The promotion recently entered into a licensing agreement with Craig Jones Invitational for use of the patented design – a stark contrast to the UFC’s apparent unilateral adoption of a similar setup.
The controversy extends beyond the physical arena. During UFC FPI 11, former UFC star Claudia Gadelha explained rule modifications that critics say closely mirror innovations developed by Craig Jones for his own grappling promotion.
The new UFC BJJ series will feature a team-based format with competitors coached by Mikey Musumeci, a decorated grappling champion, and Rerisson Gabriel, a relatively new black belt. The lightweight division features established names like Gianni Grippo and Keith Krikorian, while the welterweight roster includes wrestling standout Jason Nolf and rising star Elijah Carlton.
While the majority of the competition has already been filmed, the finale will stream live on YouTube.
The situation highlights a complex relationship with intellectual property for the UFC, which has vigorously defended its own trademark of “The Octagon” since 1993. Critics suggest the promotion may be applying a double standard by potentially infringing on another company’s patented design while protecting its own proprietary elements.
Neither the UFC nor Karate Combat has issued official statements regarding the potential patent dispute as of press time.
