In a recent podcast interview, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu athletes Sergio and Paul Ardila discussed the rampant PED use in competitive grappling, arguing that testing alone is not enough to deter athletes from using PEDs.
The brothers, both accomplished attorneys and competitors, believe that the current approach to ster*id use is fundamentally flawed. They propose a radical solution: implementing long-term bans for athletes caught using PEDs.
“If you get some minimum like a 10-year ban, then they’ll take it more seriously,” Sergio explained.
Their argument stems from personal observations of competitors who appear unnaturally enhanced, with Paul noting the physiological impacts of PED abuse, such as premature baldness in young athletes.
The Ardila brothers aren’t just talking about theoretical consequences. They’ve witnessed firsthand the devastating potential of unchecked use, referencing an ultra-heavyweight competitor who reportedly died from an undisclosed heart condition potentially linked to ster*id abuse.
“Eventually somebody’s going to die,” Paul emphasized, highlighting the serious health risks associated with performance-enhancing.
Sergio Ardila added:
“ADCC has outright said they don’t test. That’s like telling athletes they don’t give a [ ] about them. They don’t care if you pump su bstances into your body that you don’t understand. As long as you look good and put on one show, even if you lose, they’re happy. It’s a clear slap in the face to athletes.”
“They don’t care about your longevity. All they care about is their stupid lights, dragons, and being able to say, “Hey, I put on this event.” This show isn’t about you, man. You’re the promoter. Nobody gives a [] if you’re the best or worst promoter. People come to see the [ ] athletes.”
“We’re getting very specific here, but it is what it is. Know your [___] role. “
Their proposed solution goes beyond traditional testing. They suggest randomly selecting a few athletes for rigorous testing and implementing such severe penalties that the risk would outweigh any potential competitive advantage.
The core of their argument is that the current system enables and almost encourages use by not providing meaningful deterrence. With minimal consequences and significant financial incentives in competitive grappling, many athletes feel compelled to use performance-enhancing substances.
By advocating for more stringent penalties, Sergio and Paul hope to create a cultural shift that prioritizes athlete health and fair competition over short-term victories.
